A few words, the news must pass like this, pure, simple, brilliant (not in the sense of explosive) with its own light. Some time ago, a friend of mine published on his blog - for advertising purposes - his own song. All regular, no problems with the SIAE, no accusations of plagiarism, in short, everything smooth as oil.
A few months later: surfing surfing, here is the friend's song that is the background to an advertisement for a well-known brand of… mmmm no, I won't say it because otherwise I risk making everything understood.
Horror! What a bad end his song had made!
Panic! What a bad end his savings would have made, in the face of the presentation of my fee to take his defense.
But no. Do you know why?

The "green light" to the new regulation against online piracy.
The Communications Authority (AGCOM), to put it briefly, has acquired the competence for the resolution of cases of violations of copyright in the web environment. Attention, only on the web! In the real world, everything remains intact.
And we are not just talking about songs, but about any work of the intellect protected by our North Star, the RD 633/1941. Just to be clear, the first case dealt with by the Authority, since the entry into force of the new regulation on the subject, concerned the unauthorized use of photographs (and the case ended with a nice filing, as following the report the author of the crime has taken steps to remove the images not his own .... So it works!).
How does it work?
It is enough that the owner of the copyright (if you want, even directly, without having to ask your lawyer for help - alas) who believes he is the victim of a copyright infringement in a digital environment, connects to the "Complaints" section of the site www.ddaonline.it (which would stand for "Online Copyright") To report the abuse suffered, indicating in particular the URL containing the content copied, disseminated or otherwise used illegally.
Hot comments
Everything is so new that, to date, any comment on the effective functioning of this new system of competences for Agcom is useless. There was no shortage of harsh criticisms, regarding the guarantee of "contradiction" between the plagiarized subject and the plagiarist subject, as well as many doubts are arising on the actual ability of the Authority to manage what promises to be a considerable amount of reports. However, the advantages appear enormous: ease of use of the Ddaonline portal, the possibility of directly asserting one's reasons. All this in a "wild" environment, such as the internet, increasingly in need of rules to safeguard creativity and ingenuity.
Lawyer. Diego Cordua